Talk:Enfield No. 2

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

British Empire

	British Empire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Enfield No. 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:25, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

First picture, Enfield or Webley?

Someone changed the caption text to say the first picture, the one in the template box, was of a Webley .455. The uploader identifies the gun as an Enfield. I've changed the text back but I really don't know enough about the two guns to say which is correct. Can someone familiar with the Enfield confirm the picture is of the correct gun? Thanks in advance. --212.65.116.17 (talk) 19:27, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you click on the infobox picture and enlarge it, you can read the stamp marks on the revolver, which reveal that it is a Webley Mark VI, chambered in .455, and was manufactured in 1917, and therefore has very little to do with the subject of the article. Although frankly you can tell it's not a No.2 at a glance. The No.2 has a completely different hammer spur (where the spur was fitted, on models capable of single action), it doesn't have that 'step' at the front of the frame below the barrel, the trigger and trigger guard are a different and more elegant shape and it has a square 'corner' at the back, below and behind the hammer and above the grip. It's just different. See the Imperial War Museum's RAF No.2 here. https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/30033330 Khamba Tendal (talk) 18:37, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]