This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Please put an {{underconstruction}} template at the top of the article then please. That alerts reviewers that it's actively being worked on. And then when you're done, please remember to remove it. Onel5969TT me10:28, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
user:Onel5969, I'd be happy to read your opinion about the article's current condition, after the sources I brought about him, exclusively or almost exclusively. I can add more, but it may be enough for now. Waiting for your feedback. PurpleBuffalo (talk) 12:43, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okay {PurpleBuffalo}, here's my assessment of the current sourcing: 1-primary; 2-primary and unreliable; 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9-about the band, not in-depth about him; 8-not a reliable source, but the link is (so you should use the link rather than the FB post, but again, about the band; 10 - Really about the band, but it does have a couple of short paragraphs which focus on him; 11 - This one is good for notability; 12, 13, 14, 15 - brief mention and 13, 14, and 15 are also non-RS; 16 - is a regurgitated press release. The dead giveaway is the inclusion of the specs and price.
So bottom line, the addition of the Music Connection article is great, and the Charleston City Paper is a good addition as well. But in my opinion, you're one in-depth source away from meeting GNG. Hope this helps. Onel5969TT me15:09, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
PurpleBuffalo - dang, my apologies, I meant to mention in my response above for you to remember that interviews are primary sources, and as such, don't count towards notability. See footnote "C" on WP:PRIMARY. This is actually a rule which I personally disagree with to some extent, however, it is a part of WP policy, not even a guideline. Sorry not to have mentioned it before. Onel5969TT me19:54, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
user:Onel5969, Well, I'm done. There are many other sources writing/talking exclusively about him (or about him with context to the band), but putting them in the article would be pushing it towards the absurd (like ABC news reporting about his back problems, or areport about him discussing a certain song and such). I hope it will be enough. PurpleBuffalo (talk) 10:49, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Onel5969 TT me 10:28, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
