Talk:Erie Panthers

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ice Hockey

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles

Erie Mid‑importance

	Erie Panthers is part of WikiProject Erie, which is building a comprehensive and detailed guide to the Erie, Pennsylvania, including the surrounding counties of Crawford and Warren, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project.ErieWikipedia:WikiProject ErieTemplate:WikiProject ErieErie articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Re-Write

I've posted a not so stub-like article for the Erie Panthers. I'm assuming nobody will complain, but you never know. I also posted the WikiProject Erie rating tag. My personal opinion is that the article should be rated higher than "Mid", however I feel that it would be important to get other's opinions on the matter as well. I've rated the current article as "C" for now, though again, I personally feel it could be rated higher than that. So, questions/comments...If anyone's even looking that is :) Infero Veritas (talk) 21:01, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I say you rated it just fine :-) I would've went with "C" and "Mid" also. I don't think the importance should bumped any higher as the Otters are also Mid (but I'm starting to think that could be raised). B-class would be possible if you found more sources. Also some phrases like "known for two things...Lots of goals, and Lots of Fights." and "Not only were the fans passionate..." (wouldn't any fan be passionate) could be rewrote to give the article a more NPOV tone. By the way, if you need any other article looked at (Erie related or not) and don't want to go through the process of formally listing it for reassessment, feel free to drop me a note on my talk page. --D.B.^{talk•contribs} 21:30, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well I've also (and I know we're on the Panther's talk page here but..) got a rather large update to the Otters' page coming as well. I would agree that I need more sources, unfortunately there seems to be a shortage of those for the Panthers. Tons of stuff for the Blades and Otters, but since the Panthers were the bottomless abyss for hockey players (once they play here, they're doomed to mediocrity) it's tough. I also agree that some of the phrasing needs redone. I tried to take my personal feelings out of it as best I could. But I couldn't come up with another way of pointing out that the Panthers were known for those two things...high scoring games with tons of fighting/cheap shots. I've never seen a game in my life where they cancel it after the second guy leaves on a stretcher...other than here in Erie. On another note, I think that the Otters' page should for sure be a High importance article, as well as this one. When the city gets upset that a team is leaving (they didn't give a poo poo about the blades leaving) that would suggest to me that it's important.

So...is there anything that you see that might be lacking, or could be expanded on? I'm not sure how old you are, you may not even have been around for the Panthers lol. Infero Veritas (talk) 03:19, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just an update, I made some changes based on the suggestions you made. Infero Veritas (talk) 03:38, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The phrasing is better, still needs sourcing, though. I wonder if the archives of Erie Times-News has more information on the Panthers. A bit more history wouldn't hurt (any notable incidents?). I would've been old enough able to remember the Panthers probably for the last few years before they left, had I lived in Erie that is. I was watching the Vipers and Red Wings at that time. --D.B.^{talk•contribs} 03:59, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance you know of a site online where The Erie Times keeps archived articles?Infero Veritas (talk) 13:49, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For free, no. I usually have to wait until I'm back in Erie and just go down to library. --D.B.^{talk•contribs} 17:38, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Erie Panthers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:48, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Erie Panthers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:38, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Erie Panthers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101012143547/http://echl.com/echl-trohpies-p144405 to http://www.echl.com/echl-trohpies-p144405

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]