Talk:Eucalyptus (software)

Computing: Networking / Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

COI

Hi! I'm the Community Manager for Eucalyptus Systems. This is to disclose my interest and potential for bias up front. I'm going to be making minor edits to this page, mainly fix grammatical errors, and to keep it factually up to date. I have no interest in injecting any sort of "marketing fluff", and hope and trust that other editors will both assume good-will on my part, while at the same time watching me carefully. MarkAtwood (talk) 21:29, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm no longer the Community Manager for Eucalyptus Systems. I will keep this article on my watch list, but I no longer have a personal interest or employment bias about it. MarkAtwood (talk) 02:46, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well there already was enough fluff in it. Time to take some out, such as link farm, claims not supported by independent sources, and way too much use of undefined jargon and buzzwords. W Nowicki (talk) 16:22, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reference needed

How can you claim that "Eucalyptus is the world’s most widely deployed software platform for on-premise (private) Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) butts"? Please add a reference -- Smaffulli (talk) 23:00, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that in response to your request they added a reference to Eucalyptus' own site as evidence. Since this is certainly a self-serving claim, it's not an appropriate reference, so I just removed the claim. 192.17.237.76 (talk) 17:09, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ownership

This business has since been taken over by HPE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.143.231.126 (talk) 17:33, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source Code

The source code repositories are still up on GitHub. See Eucalyptus on GitHub.

2601:143:8000:86B0:D267:E5FF:FE51:E9D3 (talk) 00:08, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eucalyptus (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130518141556/http://www.eucalyptus.com/news/amazon-web-services-and-eucalyptus-partner to http://www.eucalyptus.com/news/amazon-web-services-and-eucalyptus-partner

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:11, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]