This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
I removed some sections pertaining to individual emerging markets because they were empty and had empty section tags. I added them in, a few months ago, hoping another user could find the time to expand. They made the article look visually unappealing. Until we can find more information, supported by reliable sources, let's keep them out. Let me know if anyone has any issues or would like to add them back in. Thanks! Meatsgains (talk) 23:08, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Meatsgains. I appreciate that your edits here are a while ago, but I see you've been in since 2014 and so..... I read this article as part of a jump from one page to another, as I sometimes do just for fun and interest. I thought I'd add something which might add value as by chance I have a tiny bit of background knowledge. I'd appreciate your opinion as I've only been editing for a year or so. The UK privy council, acting as the appeal court for the Jersey ruling, was quite interesting insofar as it confirmed the status of the debt but denied FG Hemisphere's claim that the liability was the DRC government's. Some activists claimed a victory against what they viewed as the unacceptable face of capitalism, but it was not a victory of principle; it was really a technicality (I do not denigrate the idea of a technicality). I thought I'd put something to that effect in, shortened to a couple of sentences? All the best, Emmentalist (talk) 20:19, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
