Talk:Fair-share scheduling

Computing: Software / CompSci Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Fair-share scheme

Fair-share is used by some hosting companies to lure customers with cheap deals. After a few weeks the service will be disabled arbitrarily citing a unfair resource overuse and a more expensive, dedicated server might be offered. Means to limit the own unfair resource use are not made available.

It is obvious why this content keeps getting removed by certain people again and again. So I recommend locking this whole article to prevent vandalism.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.193.87.140 (talk • contribs) 12:09, 27 February 2014‎

I removed it as off-topic, but realise now that I misread your edit. Even so, this is unsourced - can you provide a source that clearly frames this as a "fair-share scheduling" issue? --McGeddon (talk) 12:16, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is advertised as Fair-Share by hosting companies and means that the CPU usage is shared between users as this article explains. If you think Fair-Share Scheme should have it's own article like e.g. Ponzi Scheme,etc. I'll make it so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.193.87.140 (talk) 12:40, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article would need a reliable source that both identified such schemes as being offered by modern hosting companies, and that they "lure customers with cheap deals". If this is just a conclusion drawn from your own personal experience, I'm afraid that's not sufficient. --McGeddon (talk) 12:59, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I have enough proof and material to give a new article enough substance. Thanks for your advice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.193.87.140 (talk) 13:56, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good to hear it. Might be better as a section at virtual private server or somewhere depending on how many sources you have and the context of it. --McGeddon (talk) 15:09, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]