Talk:Fairphone
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Translation from Deutsch/German
[edit]The German version of this page has loads of additional information. It would be great if someone could translate it. --194.36.2.117 (talk) 16:33, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
- I am going to start working on this, thanks for bringing it up. ∫ A Y™ 09:57, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
The no-info/taboo rules of FP
[edit]User:Smurrayinchester let us have an open discussion about the topic. What kind of info do you miss? It's hard to provide information about a project not giving information although giving information on how a phone is made was one of their goals. But you can find related posts in the forum. I can dig them up. But lets not start and edit war before I have not understood what exactly you are looking for, okay? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.192.46.144 (talk) 20:54, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Missing information - social enterprise
[edit]The Wikipedia article Social enterprise says that such organisations can be either for-profit or non-profit. The present article does not make clear which of these types Fairphone is. It should. MPS1992 (talk) 00:40, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Eva Gouwens
[edit]Dear Wikipedia colleagues! I wrote an article about Eva Gouwens in the German Wikipedia. Unfortunately, the information about her person available on the internet is sparse. I would be glad if someone could send me extra. Greetings from Fritzober (talk) 08:05, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Maybe no longer "advert"?
[edit]The article was tagged as advert in May 2020. It seems OK now; if others agree maybe remove the template? Best wishes, Pol098 (talk) 21:01, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Not Yet. Blatant advertising. The "Partnership with the /e/ Foundation" section is only one example, obvious at a glance. I will be updating that section to give it more neutrality and improved sourcing. -- Yae4 (talk) 10:43, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- How about now? ACaseOfWednesdays (talk) 06:40, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Removing a sentence in "Operating systems" section
[edit]This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
- What I think should be changed: Removing the sentence "Ron Amadeo at ars Technica in April 2020 warned /e/ users, "they'll most likely be on an old version of Android", but as of 2023 the official /e/ support for FP3 is based on Android 12."
- Why it should be changed: Outdated, irrelevant for this subject, also WP:Weight and at this point of time rather an opinion than a fact
- References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button): The current version of /e/OS is based on Android 12 following neutral reports: "Murena calls the operating system, ‘/e/OS’ but it’s a de-Googled version of Android 12."[1]
Flovieh (talk) 08:30, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- Claim removed. Spintendo 10:45, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
References
- ^ Strickland, Lex. "Fairphone 4 has arrived in the U.S. Would you use a de-Googled phone?". The Gadgeteer.
My edit removed a potentially useful citation
[edit]The edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fairphone&oldid=1175908325 ended up removing the citation https://www.circle-economy.com/resources/the-circular-phone as the text in the article did not match the citation.
However, the citation itself seems to be a report. I'm not sure if a promotional report or unbiased report, I haven't been able to look at it in detail. Leaving it here in case it is useful to the article and someone wants to examine it. ACaseOfWednesdays (talk) 06:44, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
CEO out of date
[edit]It seems that the section "key people" in the info card is out of date. According to this link, Eva Gouwens no longer is CEO. Gamerik (talk) 15:45, 3 November 2023 (UTC)