Talk:Felix (newspaper)

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Editors

The previous version of this page used the heading "Recent editors and significant contributors". Only editors should be listed, however, as I see no clear rationale for including "significant contributors". Conversely, if a former columnist has gone on to become famous, this might be trivia that would be interesting enough to include. Nonetheless, the current list of editors probably includes some "significant contributors". I was at IC from 1999-2002, so can only be certain of those holding tenure during that period. Please could other (older;) alumni remove people from the list that were not editors. Thanks! JVC 09:35, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, at the very least Pallab Ghosh from the 1980s and Declan Curry from the 1990s have gone on to fame and notability... Adders 16:54, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Felix logo.jpg

Image:Felix logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:34, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Felix knight cat.jpg

Image:Felix knight cat.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:34, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Felix first.jpg

Image:Felix first.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:34, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Felix 1362.jpg

Image:Felix 1362.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:34, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Earlier editors

I have added Bill Goodwin as editor for 1988-1989, and if I remember rightly the 1987-1989 editor was Judith Harrington (?sp). Also I may have these two editors in the wrong order. Can anyone with access to original copies verify these or others? Rupert Clayton 18:30, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can confirm Bill and Judith's dates as well as my own (Dave Smedley). Chris Stapleton is shown as 1990 since he was elected editor but unfortunately did not meet the University requirements for degree status. Adam took up the role as the previous News Editor going into the academic year. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dgsmedley (talk • contribs) 22:06, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I still have copies of Felix from 1971-1974, so should be able to add the editors for those years. The editor at the start of 1973/74 was Alisdair (sp?) Campbell (not the Labour spin doctor) I crossed swords with him while I was editor of the RCS Broadsheet. If memory serves correctly, he left late 1973 complaining that he needed to earn some money to get through his final academic year.23:18, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

I've made the correction about Alasdair Campbell and added Oliver Dowson. Felix now has its archive online at http://felixonline.co.uk/issuearchive, so someone could trawl through all the issues and add editors.00:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DigbyJames (talk • contribs)

Editors

If I'm not mistaken, David Rowe was Felix editor in 1981-2, and M Shams Tabrez was editor the year before. Hugh Southey was editor 1984-5. I haven't changed these entries on the main page, but can anyone verify these dates?

Palab Gosh was 81-82, he also produced the imfamous banned 81 rag mag —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.89.85.182 (talk) 15:18, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Felix (newspaper). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070209020313/http://www.imperialcollegeunion.org/student-media/felix/ to http://www.imperialcollegeunion.org/student-media/felix/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:43, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Felix (newspaper). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070209103814/http://www.union.ic.ac.uk/media/iscience/ to http://www.union.ic.ac.uk/media/iscience/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:34, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]