Talk:Firbolg (Dungeons & Dragons)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Forgotten Realms work group.

Incomplete References[edit]

Put all unformatted & incomplete references here:--Robbstrd 23:49, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Weasel words??[edit]

I ask out of genuine curiosity... Where, exactly, are the weasel words in this article? --Craw-daddy | T | 00:54, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

We're not expecting all of Gavin's templates to make sense, or that he explain them, are we? BOZ (talk) 02:09, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Well, I thought that I'd ask. --Craw-daddy | T | 09:37, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
I will annotate where weasel words have been used so there is no doubt. --Gavin Collins (talk) 15:13, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Why not be bold and just remove the weasel words yourself? Actually editing and improving articles can be rewarding; you should try it. :) Rray (talk) 15:53, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
I re-read this article, and I don't think the weasel words template even remotely applies here, so I removed it. I'll admit I could be wrong, and if Gavin is willing to provide specific examples of weasel words on the talk page, I'll re-add the template myself. Rray (talk) 16:17, 18 January 2008 (UTC)


Redirect this to Creature type (Dungeons & Dragons)#Giant ?? --Craw-daddy | T | 12:54, 19 January 2008 (UTC)


Having recently started a List of Dungeons & Dragons monsters, I am trying to determine which monster articles should be redirected into the lists. I believe this article may be a suitable candidate to be merged and redirected into List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters, as that is when it first debuted in the Dungeons & Dragons game. Please discuss reasons for or against such a merge. If no discussion has taken place 5 days from now, I will redirect this article to that list; otherwise I will follow whatever discussion takes place here. Thank you!  :) BOZ (talk) 03:38, 26 April 2008 (UTC)