This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles
See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:
Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!
As stated in the edit summary, this article is based on the existing content of First South West and this has been acknowledged in said summary. A more specific article for First Kernow was required based on some of this text. The bot has found the wording on an offline version of wikipedia, so I would suggest this is ignored. Thanks.
Whistler (talk) 21:12, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the bot needs to know to ignore this sort of thing. In fact, it usually does. I guess this is a new mirror and hence it is not yet known about.
This particular mirror looks problematic, although probably not intentionally. They are entitled to copy the data but they do not acknowledge Wikimedia's copyrights and licences. Also there is no obvious way to contact them about this. --DanielRigal (talk) 21:59, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
