Talk:Fort Rupert

Canada: British Columbia / Geography Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

Indigenous peoples of North America

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Further reading/cites[edit]

I"m going through Howay & Scholefield's book for passages on Fort Rupert trying to find mention of the destruction of the fort by fire in 1888.....there's a lot of passages about the Fort in that book here is a search page for "Fort Rupert" from within that book, which is on www.nosracines.ca.Skookum1 (talk) 03:47, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

that's a link for a search of Vol. 1, this is a similar search on Vol 2 which will have the 1888 events in it.Skookum1 (talk) 03:50, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I find the tone of a lot of this article to be overtly racist. I'm just guessing because the sources quoted are white historians. Please be careful with any POV issues quoting old white people. Thanks Billyshiverstick (talk) 15:55, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and to add on, Frederick Howay is known for having been quite racist. A recent article in the journal BC Studies called Howay a white supremacist. His anti-Chinese racism has become infamous, at least among BC historians. As a source I think he is fine for certain topics--but yea, anyone using him as a source ought to be careful. And for most topics there are almost certainly better, less blatantly racist and colonial-paternalistic biased sources. If I get a chance and remember, I'll try to look at this page and see what can be done to improve things. Pfly (talk) 05:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]