Talk:Fox Learning Systems

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 November 2008. The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pittsburgh Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment[edit]

This is not an advertisment. This is an encylopedia article about a former Pittsburgh news reporter who started a company in the Pittsburgh area. Nothing in here is biased or telling anyone to buy a product. Please do not delete (Theovoice (talk) 20:13, 5 November 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Notability not really satisfied[edit]

Wikipedia's standards for notability for organizations would seem to indicate a need for something more than a couple of local papers and a puff piece on a university website. Has this organizations been covered elsewhere in the press? Or won significant awards? Or something other than just beign another small company like thousands of others? -- SiobhanHansa 22:48, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- - Keep***This is a legit and notable company. I have heard about Fox Learning Systems in many states across the nation and I've seen their videos throughout the medical community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BAT77 (talk • contribs) 20:16, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a deletion discussion it's an attempt to build up the article - please provide evidence that helps meet our notability standards. -- SiobhanHansa 20:29, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have argued the notability claim endlessly in the AfD page. I am not alone in editors wishing to keep this page up. If we can get past this claim, I have a couple points about your previous edits SiobhanHansa. You correctly noted that the link to Rite Aid's "Giving Care to Parents" Series does not mention FLS, however I am now putting in a press release that shows the two companies partnered. Also, the videos include the FLS logo. Theovoice (talk) 20:51, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citations[edit]

Does anyone have recommendations for the best way to format citations? I've seen a couple different in wikipedia, including the link right in the citation or a normal MLA format with the link as a number at the end. Thanks70.89.229.25 (talk) 15:05, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have no preference. Eastmain did a good job a couple days ago of mentioning the date of publication and such. For the medical journals at least, it might be beneficial to cite them as one would in a scholarly work, then have the small box with a number at the end so users can access the website.Theovoice (talk) 15:29, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Fox Learning Systems. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.askdebrafox.com/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717214240/http://www.vision-accomplished.com/news/Best50Women.doc to http://www.vision-accomplished.com/news/Best50Women.doc
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aagponline.org/news/pressreleases.asp?viewfull=103
Corrected formatting/usage for http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/rnk02all901to1500.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:46, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]