Talk:Freeport, Maine

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Freeport, Maine article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Maine Mid‑importance

	Maine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaineWikipedia:WikiProject MaineTemplate:WikiProject MaineMaine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Drug Related Expulsions

As true as the drug related expulsions statement is, I don't feel as if it should be mentioned in this article. Bkissin 17:18, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, and I removed it. In the same section I also removed Bates/Bowdoin name-dropping, and cleaned up the Pownal reference. JamesofMaine 18:35, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Media

I cleaned up the Media section of the article, and I hope to create specific wikipages for the Newspapers that don't already have one. Bkissin 22:26, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External Links

I restored the External Links that Ripogenus deleted. I understand the desire to clean up the page, but I feel the links are valid, and representative of organizations within the town of Freeport that may be of interest to a visitor to the page who was looking for information about the town. --Mitchsensei 03:44, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My reasoning was essentially that Wikipedia articles are not supposed to be directories, or repositories of links. I still feel it should be pared down to just the town's website. My impression is "link dumping" is seen as a lazy alternative to actually adding cited content. Ripogenus77 13:55, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what is "consensus" policy on links in general, but my own thought is that these links are organizations that are within the confines of Freeport, and generally contribute to the quality of the town. So, if FREEPORT is a category, these links seem rightful (IMHO) to be there. Some of them are indeed mentioned in the article. I live here in Freeport, so, I suppose I am not a truly unbiased source on this either. Mitchsensei 04:34, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Freeport, Maine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Freeport, Maine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2012/SUB-EST2012.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://factfinder2.census.gov/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100704222756/http://www.freeportshakespearefestival.org/ to http://www.freeportshakespearefestival.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:06, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]