Talk:G.G. (Gossip Girl)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleG.G. (Gossip Girl) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 11, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:G.G. (Gossip Girl)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 16:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Issues:

  • Top: Add the DISPLAYTITLE template at the top to italic Gossip Girl, as it is a television series
  • Infobox: No need for "The CW" in the infobox
  • Infobox: Add "running time" to the infobox
  • Image Caption: "Blair and Louis' wedding day arrives in the show's 100th episode." This is suppose to say what is in image, not 100th episode overall. How about: "Blair and Louis' get married." Or something like that. Thanks
  • Image Caption: "The St. James' Episcopal Church saw the wedding taking place" What does that mean
  • Lede: the show's 100th overall → the show's 100th episode overall
  • Lede: ""G.G" revolves around the wedding of Blair Waldorf (Leighton Meester) to Prince Louis Grimaldi (Hugo Becker)." Maybe switch that up a bit so it doesn't sound like an ad
Not sure I changed the sentence a bit but I don't know if it's what you want Sofffie7 (talk) 08:38, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Lede: Remove ""G.G" makes Gossip Girl the first series that premiered on The CW to hit 100 episodes." It already says "the show's 100th overall" at the top
    •  Done I know it sounds redundant but it was to note that Gossip Girl was the very first CW series to reach that amount of episodes; other series were cancelled before or have not yet reached the 100 episodes... Nonetheless, I have removed the sentence Sofffie7 (talk) 19:59, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Plot: Expand to show what fully happened in episode for the 44 minutes
    •  Done Do you think it is OK that way? Sofffie7 (talk) 08:14, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Music: Per guidelines, try to write the music in a few sentences, rather than a bulleted list
  • Critical reception: Digital Spy should be in italics
  • References: Ref. 3 - Yahoo! TV. Remove that source. Yahoo! TV isn't a good source for Wikipedia
    •  Done I changed it but I also erased the part about the editor since it isn't supported by the new source. Sofffie7 (talk) 21:00, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • References: Ref. 4 - Huffington Post should be The Huffington Post
  • References: Ref. 7 - That is a dead link, as I see here Please archive it, replaced it, or remove it
  • External links: For Internet Movie Database and TV.com links, it should be "G.G" not "G.G. (Gossip Girl)"
  • External links: Missing quoteation marks for The CW link
  • External links: The CW should be cwtv.com. Still, link to The CW Television Network

That's all. On hold. TBrandley 16:15, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing. I've tried to address all the issues you mentioned. --Sofffie7 (talk) 08:38, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on G.G. (Gossip Girl). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]