Talk:GWR No. 12
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
12=13?
[edit]Were 12 and 13 identical? If so, the "total produced = 1" in the fact box is a bit misleading. --Roly (talk) 11:04, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
- According to
- there were differences in several details, including:
No. 12 No. 13 Boiler barrel 4'10+13⁄32" 4'4+5⁄8" Boiler diameter outside 3'1" 2'8+1⁄2" Firebox height 4'9+13⁄16" 4'4+3⁄32" Firebox diameter inside 2'6+3⁄4" & 1'11+1⁄2" 2'3" & 1'8+1⁄2" Tubes 30 x 2" 30 x 1+3⁄4" Heating surface, tubes 36.5 sq ft 27.729 sq ft Heating surface, firebox 35.0 sq ft 26.700 sq ft Heating surface, total 71.5 sq ft 54.429 sq ft Grate area 5.1 sq ft 3.97 sq ft Boiler pressure 275 lb/sq in 300 lb/sq in
- There were other differences such as brakes and train heating, but it's apparently unclear whether these differed as delivered, or were the result of later modifications. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:49, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Hugh Llewelyn
[edit]Searching Commons for Sentinel 6515 bring up a couple of images, apparently of this loco, but captioned 'Hugh Llewelyn'. There is no mention of such a name in the references. Is it the same loco with a different name, or has a different loco been confused with 6515? -- Verbarson talkedits 20:54, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- Am I short-sighted or what? 'On closer inspection', as they say, it turns out to be the name of the photographer. -- Verbarson talkedits 21:05, 13 April 2022 (UTC)