Talk:Galena and Chicago Union Railroad

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Galena and Chicago Union Railroad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060527173739/http://www.chicagohistory.org/historylab/artifact/hl_artifact_0105.asp to http://www.chicagohistory.org/historylab/artifact/hl_artifact_0105.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:02, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Slight refocusing of first two paragraphs

To highlight the importance of the G&CU being the first railroad built starting in Chicago, I put it in the first sentence of the intro paragraph. To avoid repetition, then, I removed what was basically the same sentence from the first paragraph in the "History" section.

I also cut the point about the railroad being chartered a year before the City of Chicago -- while that's true, Chicago had already been chartered as a town in 1833, and then was moved to city status in 1837, a year after the G&CU was incorporated. The comparison as worded seemed a bit misleading to me, implying that Chicago hadn't yet been organized in any way.

I plan on adding some information on historical contexts which will better set up the historical information already there. James Postema (talk) 22:16, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Number of reference notes

Partly to respond to the warning at the top of the G&CU page about not having enough in-line citations, I've been including references for the material that I've added. If it seems like there are now too many reference notes, that's mainly because the sources have different information (one source describes an action but without giving a date, and another source includes the date but not much about what happened), and also because the sources don't always agree with each other and all contain some information that seems to be disproven elsewhere. So I've had to do a lot of cherry-picking, putting information from several sources into some paragraphs. I hope that's not too annoying, but it seemed necessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by James Postema (talk • contribs) 01:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moved warning flag about lack of inline citations down to list of depots

In light of the comment above, I think it is justified to remove the warning flag about the lack of references from the prose section of this page, but instead of deleting it, I moved it lower, to the list of depots.

The final prose paragraph about commuter service doesn't have any citations, but I've added something like 60 inline citations to everything above that. The list of depots, however, doesn't have much documentation, and what's there isn't very specific or highly reliable. Finding a train timetable from the 1860s would be a great way to back up that list, or perhaps a WPA Guide to Illinois might be a good source. James Postema (talk) 16:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source for Charles Hempstead's attendance at G&CU convention?

Thank you, IP user 73.22.100.224, for adding the information about Galena major Charles Hempstead's attendance at the convention in January 1846 about reviving the railroad's corporate status.

Could I ask, where did you find that information? If we could, it would be good to add a source citation there -- thanks! James Postema (talk) 20:29, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]