The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Don't move as the astrophysics is just a redirect to P-nuclei. Articles always have priority over redirects. Put a hatnote at the top of the math topic pointing readers to p-nuclei. D O N D E groovilyTalk to me 23:09, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Remark: Yes, P-nuclei mentions and explains the term "gamma process" but it is written as γ-process (and I tried to avoid having greek characters in a page name) --TRauscher (talk) 23:26, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Oppose. A hatnote at Gamma process pointing to P-nuclei is all that is required at this stage. Even this assumes that the lead of P-nuclei gets a minor refactor to give the hatnote and also the existing redirect from Gamma process (astrophysics) a sensible target, see principle of least astonishment: If a link takes readers to somewhere other than where they thought it would, it should at least take them somewhere that makes sense.Andrewa (talk) 23:49, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.