Talk:Garage kit

Toys Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ToysWikipedia:WikiProject ToysTemplate:WikiProject ToysToys

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Toys To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Barbie Queen of the Prom, Eve The Second Genesis CCG, More...
Assess : Rate the Unassessed Toys articles and Unknown-importance Toys articles.
Expand : Expand the doll pages, Expand Larami article
Infobox : Toys articles needing infoboxes
Photo : Request images that are needed from Wikipedia requested photographs of toys to included in each articles.
Stubs : work on stubs in Category:Toy stubs
Other : * Tag the talk pages of Toys-related articles with the {{WikiProject Toys}} banner.
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Toys articles needing attention

wikifying

Would anyone like to take on the task of getting the article up to wiki standards of quality? I currently don't have any pictures other then what could be found on the web, and i'm not sure what the copyright issues would be in this regard. Tani unit 02:47, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have a coworker who is heavy into these kits. i will see if he will allow me to take some photos of some kits in both assembled and unassembled versions. thats about all the help i think i can offer with this one. what are the other quality issues with this one? Foxphyre 18:22, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ashley76

I added a link to http://www.garagekits.us and it was taken down. This is a great site that not only expands on what garage kits are but, offers tutorials and more info on what is out there as far as kits go, and what the garage kit community is like...Ashley76 20:18, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the link; the links on how to buy each kit made the link more like a store. As such, it doesn't pass WP:EL - the external link guidelines. The site looks nice, hopefully search engines rank it appropriately. --GargoyleMT 22:39, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Japan section is a mess

The Japan section starts with a statement that is highly prejudiced and misleadingly worded (18+ works at Wonder Festival count for maybe 10% of the entire event). It then rambles into "but it also has this, and some of this, and sometimes this" which is all vague. The statement on "dominant scales" is pure nonsense, as is "preferably with an airbrush". There is no mention of extremely important topics such as how copyright regarding fan works of existing properties is handled in the country. The section is in dire need of a rewrite which would involve removing a huge swath of what is already there. 2404:2D00:5000:701:B9D2:5B05:FC57:BA04 (talk) 00:07, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]