Talk:Garden State Fireworks

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Explosives Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Explosives, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Explosives on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ExplosivesWikipedia:WikiProject ExplosivesTemplate:WikiProject ExplosivesExplosives articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

New Jersey Low‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Accidents" being removed

Two different anonymous accounts have removed, without explanation, verified accounts of accidents associated with the firm. I have restored them in both cases. I am starting this discussion so that they can come here and explain why they think these items should be removed from the article. Folks, your opinions are welcome, but you do need to realize that articles here are governed by Wikipedia policy and by consensus. To post a comment, click on "edit" above and post your comments under mine, then click "save page". Thanks. --MelanieN (talk) 01:24, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't these types of claim(s) be supported by multiple mainstream sources, or should the source at least directly support the claims that are being made? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.73.135.76 (talk) 21:19, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for coming here to discuss. Yes, the claims definitely do need to be supported by Reliable Sources. I think that is already true in both cases. The death of the child is supported by two mainstream sources, the Williamson Daily News and the Philadelphia Inquirer. The Roselle Park one is cited in a Reliable Source, but it's in an article about another accident, not a primary report of the Roselle Park inciident; does that strike you as not enough? Do you see claims in the article that are not supported by the sources? Let's get it worked out. --MelanieN (talk) 23:10, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]