Talk:Geek Charming

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Geek Charming article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This page is not a forum for general discussion about the film. Fan sites, forums, your personal theories, and speculation are unverifiable and/or original research. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about the film. Fan sites, forums, your personal theories, and speculation are unverifiable and/or original research at the Reference desk.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Disney

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Credits

I have a copy of the movie and modified the credits in the article so that the article reflects the opening credit order of the starring cast and their character names as shown in the end credits. See [1]. The first four names in the credits are shown individually, the remaining credits are shown two at a time. I am using that to mean that the first four credits are the principal starring cast and the rest are co-starring. The first four names are listed in the infobox as starring.

Originally some of the character names shown in the article were derived from character names used in the book the movie was adapted from. The movie is, however, a separate creative work that, although it is based on the novel by Robin Palmer, it is created from a screenplay/script written by Elizabeth Hackett and Hilary Galanoy. There is no obligation for a screenplay to remain faithful to the book and they seldom are. Therefore what the book says is not relevant to and can't add or modify in any way information in the article that is based on what is actually shown on the movie. The movie itself is the primary source reference as to the contents of the movie. --Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:15, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Originally the name of a extra (someone in the movie who is not listed anywhere in the beginning and end credits) was included in the cast list [2] and an editor is insisting on adding it back. Even with the reference minor cast and crew don't belong in the article. There are lots of actors listed in the end credits not listed in this article as the roles are minor, extras are even more so minor. --Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:01, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As of today the IMDb credits for this movie have been corrupted showing bogus character names and credited order. IMDb is a convenience source for credits, the movie credits themselves is the verifiable reliable source. The presumption is that the people who update IMDb have copied the information from the movie credits in good faith. Sometimes that good faith presumption is shown to be wrong. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:53, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Missing information = inconsistency = Trouble

The Plot section is missing a lot of information. For instance, it doesn't mention Amy 'til the last third of the section. Plus, too many events are missing. If you begin to wonder why the rewrite and expand sections are there, now you know. -017Bluefield (talk) 06:31, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

it airs on disney channel in norway today

please add it.84.208.59.120 (talk) 18:52, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Geek Charming. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111119072500/http://www.disneychannelmedianet.com:80/DNR/2011/Geek_Charming_Premiere_Announcement.doc to http://www.disneychannelmedianet.com/DNR/2011/Geek_Charming_Premiere_Announcement.doc

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:01, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]