Talk:Georgetown Cupcake
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Free cupcakes with Wikipedia logo
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bd/WikiXDC_Cupcakes_c_-_Stierch.jpg/100px-WikiXDC_Cupcakes_c_-_Stierch.jpg)
Aude (talk · contribs), the creator of this article and of Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-01-24/WikiXDC added the cupcake image here. 67.100.125.37 (talk) 18:45, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Nice Advertisement
[edit]This is a nice advertisement for your Cupcake store. However, it has no business being in an encyclopedia. It is also the only store referenced in the Georgetown neighborhood article as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.18.170.10 (talk) 12:19, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Yes, very interesting....
[edit]...that the word flavor (NA English spelling) is spelled "flavour" (the British & Canadian spelling); since the owners are from Toronto, that would lend credence to the belief that the owners wrote an article that advertisers their own business. In addition, Cake Love (Warren Brown's store on U Street) predates Georgetown Cupcake by several years. Unless the article is claiming that Cake Love doesn't count because it sells items other than just cupcakes, the claim that Georgetown Cupcake was the first specialty cupcake store is false.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Georgetown Cupcake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100717194455/http://www.etonline.com:80/news/2010/07/89221/ to http://www.etonline.com/news/2010/07/89221/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:23, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Georgetown Cupcake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927172524/http://www.marthastewart.com/show/election-cupcakes-and-staghorn-ferns?autonomy_kw=Election%20Cupcakes to http://www.marthastewart.com/show/election-cupcakes-and-staghorn-ferns?autonomy_kw=Election%20Cupcakes
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:41, 10 January 2017 (UTC)