Talk:German aircraft carrier II

German aircraft carrier II has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 2, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / European / German / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:German aircraft carrier II/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Petebutt (talk · contribs) 21:01, 19 April 2012 (UTC) I don't think this is working properly Petebutt (talk) 21:01, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
prose: (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments

I see nothing wrong with the Article in question. Would it be acceptable if I formally do the GA business or would it be better if I wait for the original reviewer to respond? Thurgate (talk) 12:45, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Critique

With only 10000 hp (7500 kW) there is no way the ship could reach 32 knots. If it was ten times more it would look reasonable. 18 March 2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.0.237.96 (talk) 08:40, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]