Talk:German destroyer Z33

German destroyer Z33 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 1, 2018. (Reviewed version).

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / European / German / Russian & Soviet / World War II / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	World War II task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:German destroyer Z33/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 06:53, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will take this one, comments to follow in next few days. Zawed (talk) 06:53, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

There is several uses of "damaged", including two in the same sentence. Consider paraphrasing some of these.
- Good idea.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:05, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Modifications

"they were replaced by weapons from the taken from the wreck of the heavy cruiser Lützow": the first "from the" needs to be deleted
The section refers to 15 cm; 3.7 cm; 2 cm: shouldn't there be dashes in there for consistency with previous usage where the "centimetre" is recited in full?
- No, the MOS says a non-breaking space between abbreviated measurements, not a dash.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:05, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Service history

link Lützow (and shouldn't it be the Lützow?
- Linked in the Modifications section. You can use "the ship", but you need to be consistent and I generally don't use it.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:05, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Whoops, apologies, I overlooked that. Zawed (talk) 08:49, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Other stuff

Image tags check OK
No dab links
No dupe links
No external links so no issues there

Overall, minimal issues and those that are there should be straightforward to address. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 08:05, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:05, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

All good, passing as GA now. Zawed (talk) 08:49, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]