Talk:Gordon Weisenborn

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 January 2019 and 7 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ehenricks.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Review

This is a start, but needs much more with regards to the bibliography and crafting a compelling lead and entry on the filmmaker Gordon Weisenborn. Consider using sources like the Academic Film Archive of North America, or Chicago Film Archives, both of which have Wiesenborn's works in their collections. Consider also Geoff Alexander's book on Academic Filmmaking and articles on Weisenborn and his films in the Chicago Tribune and New York Times. AmyDeer (talk) 02:48, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Review

The way you editing the references is clear and reliable. I think you need more informations from the artists, like, career, artists's art pieces, now is good~ (talk)

Review

Citations As of now, the article has an average of 1 citation every other sentences, and there are certain sentences that do need their own citation because they don't have a clear connection to the following sentence. It is strong in how many references you have, they just need to be cited more frequently.
Content Gaps The article is pretty succinct, although it still needs more information. The article feels like it doesn't have enough information still to garner notability. It is dense with information, so it would help to draw it out a little more too.
Organization The lead is a good overview of Weisenborn, but the Career section's order is confusing, either it needs to be broken down and reordered under subsections, or it should be ordered to go in chronological order.
(SJCribbs (talk) 13:57, 12 March 2019 (UTC))[reply]