Talk:Gosairhat Upazila
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Coordinate error
[edit]{{geodata-check}}
The coordinates need the following fixes:
Present coordinates 23°04′35″N 90°25′54″E / 23.0765°N 90.4318°E is not appropriate for Gosairhat Upazila, rather it is situated in Kalkini Upazila. The correct position of Gosairhat Upazila is 23.0765289°N/90.4318678 as per wikimapia. : Yeah, you can see here
- May I request to put the correct coordinates. Regards, User_talk:Mizan1947
Mizan1947 (talk) 17:44, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Adding three more numerals after the decimal points had the effect of moving the marker less than 10 meters on the ground -- from a small, open area to a neighboring tree. It is difficult to imagine how the present coordinates are not appropriate for an upazila (a subdistrict), unless I'm missing something. BrainMarble (talk) 22:20, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gosairhat Upazila. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140728231735/http://203.112.218.66/WebTestApplication/userfiles/Image/Census2011/Bangladesh_glance.pdf to http://203.112.218.66/WebTestApplication/userfiles/Image/Census2011/Bangladesh_glance.pdf
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://203.112.218.66/WebTestApplication/userfiles/Image/Census2011/Rajshahi/Shariatpur/Shariatpur_C01.pdf - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://203.112.218.66/WebTestApplication/userfiles/Image/Census2011/Rajshahi/Shariatpur/Shariatpur_C04.pdf - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://203.112.218.66/WebTestApplication/userfiles/Image/Census2011/Rajshahi/Shariatpur/Shariatpur_C06.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gosairhat Upazila. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140812204858/http://www.bbs.gov.bd/WebTestApplication/userfiles/Image/District%20Statistics/Shariatpur.pdf to http://www.bbs.gov.bd/WebTestApplication/userfiles/Image/District%20Statistics/Shariatpur.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:27, 21 October 2017 (UTC)