Talk:GovWorks

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Websites: Computing

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Peacock tag

Flagged peacock because of the "Current Ownership" section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.224.37.169 (talk) 23:43, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"A Path to Failure" section

I removed the section titled "A Path to Failure." While there was some sourcing for the section, the analytical, conclusion-oriented tone of the entire section seemed very un-encyclopedic to me. It is not the job of Wikipedia to theorize why GovWorks failed, or to say things like the CEO fell into one of the "pitfalls of power," being "greed." I will try and come back to this in the next few days to use the sourcing that was supplied to revise this into something like a "Reasons for Failure" section, but in the interim if anybody's actually looking at this article and cares to comment, please do! Cheers, ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 14:19, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on GovWorks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140210101028/http://www.cnet.com/1990-11136_1-6278387-1.html to http://www.cnet.com/1990-11136_1-6278387-1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:53, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]