Talk:Graham v. Connor

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Law Enforcement Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Formatting[edit]

This article is difficult to read due to its formatting, with lack of clear subdivisions and organization. It could benefit from reformatting/restructuring to make the article clearer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Psykonautiks (talk • contribs) 13:13, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Need more analysis[edit]

The bulk of this article is the SCOTUS syllabus, which should be replaced by an analysis written in less technical language, and perhaps some more contextual information (how this case fits into the larger picture of excessive-force cases in the US). We already link to the syllabus, in WikiSource. Peter Chastain ^{[habla, por favor]} 18:50, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Outcome after remand?[edit]

The article says case was remanded with instructions for reconsideration. So what was the final outcome? 2604:2D80:ED08:A00:54D:1595:AE98:24FF (talk) 14:59, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]