Talk:Grey reef shark

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Grey reef shark has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
May 9, 2009 Good article nominee Listed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 10, 2009.
Wikipedia CD Selection
WikiProject icon Grey reef shark is included in the Wikipedia CD Selection, see Grey reef shark at Schools Wikipedia. Please maintain high quality standards; if you are an established editor your last version in the article history may be used so please don't leave the article with unresolved issues, and make an extra effort to include free images, because non-free images cannot be used on the DVDs.
 
WikiProject Sharks (Rated GA-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sharks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sharks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Conservation Status?[edit]

This shark is listed as endangered by the aquatic network. The iucn red list has it listed as Lower Risk/near threatened which system are we using?

Gray or Grey reef shark?[edit]

GrahamBould just changed from Gray to Grey reef shark, I was about to change back, but I did a check in fishbase and it spells it Grey, same with ITIS, marinebio spells Gray, a quick Google test seams to indicate that Grey is more common, so everything seams to indicate that we have the wrong name and no redirect, I will be bold and do a move now, which will make a redirect, but I'm not sure. Anyone? Stefan 14:29, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Hum can not move over a redirect since it has a history, anyway, then lets talk and decide and then make the request to an admin to move if it is correct. I think it is. Anyone else? Stefan 14:37, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Leonard Compagno spells it grey in Sharks of the World, Princeton University Press, New Jersey 2005 ISBN 0-691-12072-2. He's pretty authoritative. GrahamBould 09:04, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Must be Grey[edit]

Never heard of Gray reef shark--146.50.201.49 07:42, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Grey reef shark/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

This is a wonderfully interesting article. I have no suggestions for improvement to offer. It is excellent. —Mattisse (Talk) 20:51, 9 May 2009 (UTC) GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): Very well written; interesting and clearly presented b (MoS): Follows MoS
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): Excellently referenced b (citations to reliable sources): References are to reliable sources c (OR): No OR apparent
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): Covers all major aspects b (focused): Remains focused on topic
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Congratuations! Another great article.

Mattisse (Talk) 20:57, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Reproduction[edit]

Is this species actually viviparous, or is it ovoviviparous? DS (talk) 15:13, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

All members of the family Carcharhinidae are viviparous, except for the tiger shark. -- Yzx (talk) 18:01, 10 May 2009 (UTC)