Talk:Grumpy Cat's Worst Christmas Ever

A fact from Grumpy Cat's Worst Christmas Ever appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 December 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Aubrey Plaza rewrote the majority of her lines when voicing Grumpy Cat in Grumpy Cat's Worst Christmas Ever?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Grumpy Cat's Worst Christmas Ever.

Wikipedia

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Holidays: Christmas Low‑importance

	Holidays portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Christmas task force.

Critical reception section

(cur | prev) 06:04, 4 January 2015‎ Winkelvi (talk | contribs)‎ . . (8,490 bytes) (-495)‎ . . (Reverted 1 edit by 72.240.137.150: Regardless, the entire quote is unnecessary, there were mixed reviews, and adding another negative review - especially a complete quote - is undue weight - take it to the article talk page. (TW)) (undo) So now it's down to "unnecessary" and "undue weight." And yet there are other quotes there. Before, the problem was the website was unreliable...until I showed you it wasn't. Whatever, dude -- typical Wiki arbitrary b.s.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.240.137.150 (talk) 06:17, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, definitely undue weight. And reviews of reliable sources of legitimate online sources should be preferred over a review of a half-baked online blog written by freelance writers. From what I've found online about Paul Mavis, he's likely his biggest fan. See my reasons as "arbitrary" if you wish, let's just keep the section from becoming bloated, shall we? -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 06:26, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"half-baked online blog written by freelance writers"?? Oh, dear, your snobby elitism is showing, ducky. Or perhaps more accurately: jealousy? Did you apply once to write there, and were turned down? Is that it? After all: you probably thought it better to have thousands of hits every day for all those half-baked reviews, along with all those other impertinent freelance writers...than being an anonymous nobody editor on Wiki, with the vast power to edit...Grumpy Cat entries. Now whose their own biggest fan, in their own mind? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.240.137.150 (talk) 14:10, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]