Talk:Guldbagge Awards

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Film awards task force.
	This article is supported by the Nordic cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Sweden Mid‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Etymology

The etymology section seems too wordy. The rose chafer is a "golden" beetle, and the name isn't that strange. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The etymology section is missing a key piece of information. Namely, that bagge also means "ram" (as in male sheep). The word tacka means "ewe" (as in female sheep). So guldbagge can be seen as an analogue of guldtacka (which means "gold bar", or alternatively, "golden ewe"). I haven't been able to locate a source for this pun, however. Gabbe (talk) 17:16, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of individual award pages

I have concerns whether individual awards pages like 51st Guldbagge Awards are notable. I think they may be better of merged to one longer list. Individually, they don't seem to pass muster for WP:N. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:29, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guldbagge Awards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140320172251/http://guldbaggen.se/cms/wp-content/uploads/Guldbaggenominering_K3_color_2012.pdf to http://guldbaggen.se/cms/wp-content/uploads/Guldbaggenominering_K3_color_2012.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:07, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]