Talk:Hérouxville

Canada: Quebec / Communities Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian communities.

Hérouxville, Code of Conduct was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 5 April 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Hérouxville. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

The English version of "Life standards of Herouxville" is mistranslated or at the very least their is a lack of correspondence between the text. this page should be viewed with caution.

Added English translation of article

Need some current links in English. Please help update. By the way, this is a direct translation, the line "highlight the evident xenophobia" was in the original French article, no POV intended. I will not revert changes to eliminate that line so as not to cause any controversy (but if someone else should they should subtantiate change accordingly). Berimbau1 22:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Hérouxville Standards by Bearcat

I'd like to know why my referrence to Hérouxville Standards is consistently removed while it is extremely pertinent to the city and content of the main article. There is no valid reason to obfuscate this entry.

Your reference has not been removed from this article; it was merely moved to another spot in the article. Bearcat 01:55, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Same problem into Wiki:FR ), I think ReasAcc as a improper sub-title. And something like "Controversies over Herouxville Standards" should be better"--Ecclecticus2 09:56, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Targeting of religious minorities

It is all referenced Globe and Mail article. It is not reasonable to remove items that are referenced. It is extremely pertinent because it explains why these prohibition are controversial and particularly offensive to religious minorities.

Specifically, - the prohibition on veiling one's face in public targeted the wearing of the hijab, an exclusive practice of Muslim women; - the prohibition on symbolic "weapons" was in the context of a recent court case of students in Montreal wearing a Kirpan to school, an exclusive practice of Sikhs; - the statement that "food nourishes the body, not the soul" is in reference to the Jewish practice of eating kosher meats; - the reference to "blood transfusions" targeted the practices and beliefs of Jehovahs Witnesses, which have also been in the news lately.

Mentioning these is also highly relevant, because it also explains why these groups are particularly offended. --Soulscanner 05:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

However, the "targeted" groups are not directly specified in the controversial measures. It is open to interpretation, as no particular group or organisation is named. The rules are not intended to affect any religious group, but rather the general public.
I am uncertain inference has its place in an encyclopedia. I would rather judgemental reasoning be used.
Perhaps a "Backlash" subsection would be in order.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hérouxville, Quebec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:25, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]