Talk:H̱ (Unicode)
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the H̱ (Unicode) redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
(Early talk)
[edit]Isn't the Arabic letter ح usually transcribed as ḥ? This seems to be a mistake here. But I am not 100% certain as maybe there is more than one alternative.--68.72.110.111 16:44, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
"This lack of a precomposed character may pose a problem for some layout engines." Is this so? What self-respecting layout engine can't handle composing a diacritic? babbage (talk) 16:11, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Handling of lk to Unicode sense
[edit]I was about to put
- == See also ==
- * ẖ (Unicode)
bcz i saw that article more as "Handling of ẖ using Unicode" than as a different sense of the character ẖ, but i probably don't know enuf to quibble over that distinction! Thanks for finishing it up.
--Jerzy•t 06:34, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
- I do not think we need an article on the Unicode glyph any more than we distinguish, say, à from à (Unicode). Just do a single article discussing the letter, including all its possible meanings and its encodings. Seeing how à redirects to grave accent, it may be best to merge the entire thing into Combining macron below. --dab (𒁳) 10:16, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
- Seems pretty reasonable. (And for the record, my primary concern was with the labeling of the page as a Rdr.)
Do you think Ḥ is a similar case; i'm loath to tackle it.
--Jerzy•t 07:56, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- Seems pretty reasonable. (And for the record, my primary concern was with the labeling of the page as a Rdr.)