Talk:HL-20 Personnel Launch System

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Spaceflight (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Aviation (Rated B-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 
 


Copyright violation[edit]

Large portions of this article is copied straight from: http://www.astronautix.com/craft/hl20.htm I fair-use a single sentence from a press release and have some retarded editor yelling on my talk page within in hours. This article, illegally, has been in massive violation for months and no one has even noticed it. That's Wikipedia right there for ya. --85.82.179.226 (talk) 08:55, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

The lifting body story didnt stop there, HL-42 was studied after that .. Savuporo (talk) 13:09, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Please note that the large portions of text copied in this article come from NASA, and therefore are not subject to copyright, so the claim that there is a copyvio here is just wrong. That being said, we're better then this, so I'm standing with the IP user who has recently removed it. Yes, the NASA content is free to use, but that doesn't mean that we need to simply copy it. Read it, summarize, and re-add the content to the article. I may get around to doing this myself eventually, but this article is not exactly on the top of my personal to do list, so to speak.
— V = I * R (Talk • Contribs) 00:05, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Your proposal to rewrite the text is sound. However, until someone gets around to it, it is better to have the NASA text than nothing. -Arb. (talk) 10:35, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
I can live with that, and the article already includes a couple of tags. I probably won't get back here for 6 months or so however, so if anyone feels up to it then please just start editing. Just take a couple of paragraphs at a time and summarize/paraphrase them.
— V = I * R (Talk • Contribs) 17:04, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Need to add info about the design being taken from the Bor-4[edit]

I believe it is very important to the article.--Craigboy (talk) 01:42, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/01/science/space/01private.html?pagewanted=2&_r=3&ref=science

Repeating Information[edit]

Need to remove some of the current redundantness of the article.--Craigboy (talk) 01:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

More concept art[edit]

http://up-ship.com/blog/?p=165

http://up-ship.com/blog/?p=137 --Craigboy (talk) 04:05, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on HL-20 Personnel Launch System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required on behalf of editors regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification, as with any edit, using the archive tools per instructions below. This message updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 1 May 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:01, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Mig-105[edit]

The story of capturing the BOR-4 shape is known, but is there any reference of direct influence of (earlier) Mig-105 design? Aarrcchhiimmeeddeess (talk) 14:01, 3 January 2018 (UTC)