Talk:Haar wavelet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Mathematics (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject Mathematics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Mathematics rating:
Start Class
Low Importance
 Field: Applied mathematics

Can we ditch the ASCII art and get a proper graphic? It took me half a minute to figure out that it was a representation of a graph on a cartesian coordinate system. - 19:58, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the Edit this page link. You don't even need to log in, although there are several reasons why you might want to. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. --W(t) 20:04, 2005 May 23 (UTC)


Seems logical since Haar-like features doesnt seem notable on its own and content could easily be merged here. Hadrianheugh (talk) 04:54, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Please allow the editors of this strange article to expand it first and make it comprehensible. Every month 20 or so papers are published in scientific or semi-scientific journals that apply wavelets or wavelet-like ideas to some area in engineering, esp. image and speech recognition. Most of those ideas or modifications of standard algorithms are not notable enough for inclusion, except they could get get a strong and long-living support/care from several editors.--LutzL (talk) 09:15, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
I left this message in talk:Haar-like features

”Hi. Just came up to read about the subject (I study bioinformatics) and found the article fine (needs some improvement though). As the previous commenter I don't see it appropiate to merge it with Haar-wavelet. Many people, like me, needs more information about the topic and is able to understand this subject, but does not have any idea about what a wavelet is. Keep it simple please.″ (talk) 09:10, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

I do not think Haar-like features should redirect here, as they are completely different topics. And since Haar-like features are one of the more common (and successful) approaches to machine vision, I would consider that notable. On the other hand, I do think Haar transform should point here. Maghnus (talk) 08:39, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

I agree with Maghnus, we should merge Haar transform into this article.

I also think Haar transform should be merged here. Thenub314 (talk) 06:46, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Is it really a complete system? What about and ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 08:30, 9 November 2010 (UTC)