Talk:Hannah Gonzalez

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Miniapolis, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 29 December 2013. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!
Please address the following issues as well as any other cleanup tags before re-tagging this article with copyedit: Notability concerns

This page should not be speedy deleted because...

This page should not be speedily deleted because... all information contained in the article is verifiable, are certified media links for review. If a friend librarian thinks Wikipedia should not be the reason I would like to know, so far only an automatic bot is against. --Xergiomax (talk) 01:09, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You should provide WP:RS, which none of these are. Zappa O Mati 01:36, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

are embedded in the article. Check it. Xergiomax (talk) 01:44, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

These are still the exact same sources bro. Still not a reliable source in sight. Zappa O Mati 01:48, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

what would be a reliable source for you? use of media items recognized in their countries.Xergiomax (talk) 01:57, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources mean prominent national/city newspapers, like those seen at newstands, not blogspot and YouTube. Probably because I don't speak Spanish (I'm Vietnamese), but possibly, one MAY be reliable. This article is better off on Spanish Wkipedia. Let's see... Three unreliable sources (one that's pretty much a batch of links like a YouTube search results page), a POSSIBLY reliable page, and a few other links that I honestly do not know of since it doesn't use the cite web format, and a dead link. Besides, much of the article needs an awful lot of cleanup. Zappa O Mati 02:16, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If I remove dead sources, the youtube and other changes and new news for newspapers may be kept in the Wikipedia article? Xergiomax (talk) 02:28, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly does that mean? Sorry, but your grammar needs some work. Zappa O Mati 02:30, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I say that if I delete dead links, add other reliable sources may be accepted article?Xergiomax (talk) 02:34, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

02:40, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

If you can find any reliable sources, like whatever big newspaper where you live for example, then yes, the article can be kept, but you should also provide enough, since an admin might delete the page unexpectedly. Zappa O Mati 02:37, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How long do I have? I own that I can use new sources for the article. I need to know how many I need verifiable sources.Xergiomax (talk)

Just do it as fast as possible, since this page has sources, and isn't a copyvio, this has a chance to last for about a few more hours. Zappa O Mati 03:03, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I repair dead links, and I'm studying some new items for inclusion.190.66.118.87 (talk) 21:41, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats, the article is kept. Zappa O Mati 23:37, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

happens with this message:" This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. This article may require copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling. (October 2012) The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. (October 2012)" will remain? Xergiomax (talk) 13:37, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Hannah Gonzalez. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]