Talk:Harry "Skip" Brandon

Untitled

I'm new to editing wikipedia articles, though I have some small experience working on another smaller wiki project set up by some friends. Anyway, this article concerns my father, who is also one of my bosses at the moment. Neither he, nor anyone at our company, have had anything to do with this particular article, and we agree it does read like a resume, which isn't helpful to anyone, including us, as it just makes it look like we're ineptly trying to promote him and the company. (We suspect it was altered to the current state by a PR person trying to promote Skip ahead of an interview or speech). So I'm going to be trying over the next few days and weeks to try to clean up this article so it consists only of verifiable information, and doesn't read like a promotion or resume, but I'm fairly new to wikipedia so I'm hoping to get some help. I'm trying to give full disclosure of my relationship and all in hopes that it won't appear that I'm doing anything untoward, I'm just trying to fix up this article! Would it be appropriate, at least for the moment, to roll it back to the January 17 2007 version? That seems to have been the last version before it was altered to it's current, resume-like state. I'd then like to work to improve it and flesh it out a bit, but that seems like a pretty good starting place. Brandonshire (talk) 17:08, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Sure, go ahead. It is currently prodded (proposed for deletion), but this procedure, designed for uncontroversial deletions, can be forestalled by removing the tag. The longer version makes it harder to see what is noteworthy than the short earlier one. Welcome to wikipedia!John Z (talk) 00:32, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I've reverted the content of the page to the last version before the "resume-like" edit was made, I didn't completely revert back to that version as I wasn't sure if it was appropriate yet to remove various tags (like the resume-like warning at the top) and such. Still learning about all of this stuff... Anyway thanks for the help so far! Hopefully I can work to make this article more informative, while keeping it factual and verifiable! Brandonshire (talk) 18:30, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Harry "Skip" Brandon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120912200016/http://www.wusa9.com/news/article/220804/158/On-11th-Anniversary-Of-911-Are-We-Safer to http://www.wusa9.com/news/article/220804/158/On-11th-Anniversary-Of-911-Are-We-Safer

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:30, 30 October 2017 (UTC)