Talk:Harwick Mine disaster

Mining Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occupational Safety and Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Pennsylvania may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Why is mine engineer Selwyn M. Taylor "well-known"?Jtyroler (talk) 10:56, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

removed. --Lockley (talk) 18:35, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ranking

I would like to include a sentence along the lines of, "This was the Xth worst coal mining disaster in the 20th century." The article originally made an erroneous claim that it was in the top 10 coal mining disasters ever, which wasn't even true for the time period let alone today. From what I've seen online, it definitely will rank in the top 20 or 30 coal mining disasters and it could be in the top 50 mining disasters. (These are rated based on total deaths.) If anyone can find a comprehensive list of mining disasters to properly reference, please add it to the article.Gtwy (talk) 09:03, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the original author of the page, and I'm about to change back two of your revisions. Here's why. (1) The 'ranking' sentence was accurate. It said this mine disaster "ranks among the ten worst coal mining disasters in American history". The source is [here http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/statistics/content/coaldisasters.html]. (2) You eliminated the phrase "about 180 lives" because it seemed vague. It was vague on purpose. The casualty counts for mine disasters, labor union conflicts and other such incidents in this era are estimates. The cited source "Cheswick Mine Disaster Growing" talks a good deal about the uncertainty of these numbers. --Lockley (talk) 18:34, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding in the top 10. Thank you for the citation. Everything I had looked up did not reference it and I wasn't sure where you were getting your numbers. Ex: http://www.msha.gov/MSHAINFO/FactSheets/MSHAFCT8.HTM. Gtwy (talk) 19:48, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Harwick Mine disaster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150619225730/http://jw-hartman.com/mifflintownship/newsletters/2004/2004-02.pdf to http://jw-hartman.com/mifflintownship/newsletters/2004/2004-02.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:19, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]