Talk:Heather Brooke (author)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Journalism

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles

Heather Brooke?[edit]

A different Heather Brooke is a pornographic actress. This obviously isn't the page I was looking for.

Ditto. Disappointed. 71.56.2.160 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 03:55, 22 September 2008 (UTC).[reply]

I wonder why there isn't an article about that Heather Brooke yet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.17.102.56 (talk) 19:30, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There was a page about Heather Brooke the pornographic actress. It was deleted in August 2008 according to Wikipedia's deletion policy as basically insubstantial. You can read that discussion at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2008_August_3#Heather_Harmon

Heather Harmon, aka Heather Brooke has been brought back from deletion (see post below) and placed back in the main page space. It's too bad that this Heather Brooke (author) had been moved to just Heather Brooke (see discussion below). At least it was possible to put a disambiguation link on the top of the page. -Stillwaterising (talk) 01:24, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Uncontroversial Move ƒingers^on_Roids 20:29, 16 May 2009 (UTC) This page should be moved to Heather Brooke, which currently redirects here. The reason this page is titled Heather Brooke (author) is that there was formerly another article on a person called Heather Brooke, but it was deleted as non-notable (see the link just above this section). As this is now the only Heather Brooke with an article on Wikipedia, there is no need for the disambiguation brackets. Robofish (talk) 22:24, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support. No disambiguation needed, since there's no ambiguation in the first place. Jafeluv (talk) 06:25, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I'm going to move this up to the noncontroversial requests section on the WP:RM page, seeing as this is about as uncontroversial as it gets.ƒingers^on_Roids 18:18, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Heather (Brooke) Harmon[edit]

I've brought the page for Heather (Brooke) Harmon back from deletion and it now undergoing deletion discussions. Sorry to say, but Heather Harmon is a much more popular as Heather Brooke that the author. Please see the Google Trends in Harmon's article for details. --Stillwaterising (talk) 10:06, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]