Talk:Hemiballismus

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Neurology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Neuroscience Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Hemiballismus.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Edits by Meredith Goolsby

This user changed the article from an organically growing article to a textbook article with atypical style. It might be best to copy-edit for style using part of the article before this user's edits. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 20:58, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just for informational purposes, I can tell you that Meredith's edits were done as part of an assignment for an introductory neuroscience class at Georgia Tech. I think they've added a substantial amount of useful information, but the style does leave something to be desired. Looie496 (talk) 21:05, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]