This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
The "high-gravity lager" that most people know of is stuff like 211 and Olde English High Gravity, which are hardly "more expensive" than other lagers. The popular etymology has arisen that they're called "high-gravity" lagers because they get you dead-drunk, so that the Earth's gravitational pull is heightened so you fall on your ass. I've come across Elephant High-Gravity (which complies with labeling requirements) that sells for $8 for a six-pack. This really is exclusive and "more expensive," but the typical experience is for a $2.29 forty of 211. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.169.195.207 (talk) 22:51, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sure they can be, like Barley Wine. The marketers at some domestic large scale breweries have latched onto what was once an obscure technical term known mostly to brewers and home brewers, that of specific gravity, and slapped it on the cans of some mediocre tasting, high strength beers a.k.a. malt liquor. Popular etymologies are often dead wrong fanciful creations, sometimes doubly so when the people making them up have had a few too many. To make matters worse, in some cities in the US imported or craft beers with more than 5-6 percent alcohol have to be sold labeled as "malt liquor" even if no one would ever mistake them for a dubious skid row product. Cheers. Whitebox (talk) 12:52, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]