This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
The "Kingdom of Egypt" section contains political opinion and presents controversial and contended issues as fact. It makes claims of genocide in post-colonial Egypt with no meaningful citations. One can sense a strong presence of present-day political ideology in what is supposed to a neutral history article.
I entirely agree. It came across as outright xenophobia toward non-Western peoples. Similarly biased text, added in this edit last summer, was present in several other places in the article. I've removed those passages, and I've rewritten the final paragraph to focus on the bare facts. A. Parrot (talk) 07:34, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
So hundreds of Europeans and other immigrants or minorities were murdered, and you removed that segment because you think it's xenophobic. That is not focusing on the facts. 80.195.3.151 (talk) 14:09, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The photo shows King George V standing in the rear row, whilst an elderly Egyptian (or wherever he's from) sits with Queen Mary. I believe he gave up his seat for the old man and was supposedly praised for his Kingly generosity in the Arab world - I think I saw it mentioned in the late 90s/early 2000s biography of Kitchener (?Pollock). Might be worth a mention if somebody has a source.Paulturtle (talk) 01:58, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
