Talk:History of Richmond, Virginia

Virginia High‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Richmond, Virginia (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Richmond, Virginia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Richmond, VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject Richmond, VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject Richmond, VirginiaRichmond, Virginia articles

Citation needed

This edit done way back in 2005, claiming that the first Masonic Hall in America was in Richmond, needs verification. A few other pages claim it was in Boston. Wodenhelm (Talk) 01:54, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It should be properly qualified as "the oldest structure built and continuously used for Masonic purposes", i.e. it was the oldest one built expressly for the Masons AND that has been used by Masons ever since then. It is quite possible the others you speak of may have been built earlier but ceased usage during some point (even if temporarily), or built for some other purpose and converted to Masonic use. For the citation supporting this version of the claim, see the National Register nomination, at Section 8, first line. Morgan Riley (talk) 02:48, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Correction made, adding qualification, date, and citation. Morgan Riley (talk) 02:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of Richmond, Virginia

What is missing from the city timeline? Please add relevant content. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 10:20, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of Richmond, Virginia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:55, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Flag of Richmond, Virginia.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:55, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of citations

This article is largely uncited. I am happy to work on some cleanup and adding inline citations, but it would be great to have some help. Is anyone interested?–CaroleHenson (talk) 04:00, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've been trying to improve the overall referencing and quality of Virginia articles, so I'm happy to take a look too.--Mojo Hand (talk) 23:51, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mojo Hand, That would be great! I like to work on prehistory and 19th-century history. Do you mind if I start there?–CaroleHenson (talk) 00:26, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever suits your fancy. I don't have a specific focus, other than usually avoiding the prehistory sections☺--Mojo Hand (talk) 14:45, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cool! Sounds great.–CaroleHenson (talk) 18:53, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't forgotten this article. I am finishing work on an article and I will come over here.–CaroleHenson (talk) 14:21, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries - I tend to putter around more than focus on any article. Unfortunately, I think we may have a problem. Some of the text appears to be copied or closely paraphrased from A Short History of Richmond - for example, here. I don't have time to dig into it now, but I am concerned about how much of an issue this is.--Mojo Hand (talk) 16:26, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch! I ran the copyvios tool and found this. The intro has been the same for a long time, so it's possible that it was copied from Wikipedia rather than the other way around. But, it looks like there are three sources - plus the one you found - to take a look at to double-check. I will do that first when I pop back over here.–CaroleHenson (talk) 17:00, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]