Talk:Homoerotic poetry

Poetry Mid‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Rename

I'm thinking Poetry and homosexuality would be a better name. Thoughts? Banjeboi 00:38, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure "and" names are really a good idea unless the article is really about an intersection of two topics. I suggest we split into Homoerotic poetry and Category:Gay poets. --Alynna (talk) 22:17, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Generally support. -- Banjeboi 00:37, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Hunting of the Snark

Lewis Carroll's "Hunting..." is male homosexual and gay poetry. And it is great and very mean poetry meant to pull readers' legs for more than one century. The illustrations couldn't be clearer, especially fit 8. The most interesting aspect ot that story is how this topic has been missing from the main stream discussion of "Snarkists" since 1876: See Talk:The_Hunting_of_the_Snark#A_face_in_the_last_picture.3F, or directly go to the illustration de:Diskussion:The_Hunting_of_the_Snark#Snake in the German wikipedia, where something is highlighted which may be the Snark. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DL5MDA (talk • contribs) 16:33, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for forgetting the signature. --DL5MDA (talk) 16:53, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clean-up

I'm going to try to get this article up to snuff. Merpin (talk) 17:16, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Syntax

"The Canadian gay poet Edward A. Lacey died after being run over in the street while drunk in Bangkok; repatriated to Canada, he remained bedridden." It is true that Lacey was repatriated and put to bed after he died or does this sentence structure need some work?Tomandzeke (talk) 19:24, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Homoerotic poetry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100502020607/http://www2.hu-berlin.de/sexology/BIB/KnobelEngl.htm to http://www2.hu-berlin.de/sexology/BIB/KnobelEngl.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:59, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Jazzalyn Velez Article

Has anyone been able to find that article? It is mentioned in the Further Reading section, but might not actually exist. If it does exist, it is hard to locate.

Standards of inclusion? Any women at all?

This article briefly lists a couple of women in the header, but there are literally none discussed in the body of the article.

The inclusion of male poets seems extremely scattershot, giving the obscure Ralph Chubb equal or greater weight than Auden and Ginsberg, among other odd inclusions and omissions.

Can some external standards for inclusion be found? Distingué Traces (talk) 23:16, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]