Talk:House of Julia Felix

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Roman Civ Review-Nate French

You have done a great job describing the house, and its uses. The information is all excellent, but there seems to be some issues with citations. There is no second reference and some of them seem to be identical (the answers.com-which may also not be an appropriate source). The background section is great, as is the description of the art. However, the excavation section is a bit confusing. Also, pictures would be excellent if you can figure them out. Some art and pictures of the house would be ideal. -Nate French

Roman Civ Review

This was a really interesting article to read and I especially liked the background information as well as the insights from excavation. I would check the links that show up as red, which mean they don’t match specific Wikipedia articles. The blue ones work fine and help with unusual terms, but things like “Roman statues” won’t have their own articles. Other than editing your citations like Nate mentioned (check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Footnotes), I would just edit a few of your sentences for clarification. For instance, the second to last sentence about the caldarium would be a lot clearer if you broke it up into a few more sentences. That way people unfamiliar with the Latin terms would get a clearer sense of their definitions. Also, just in terms of the text of the citations, be careful of typos like “answers COrporation” and the date which I think you mean to read 2007-05-07 but reads 2207. 22:19, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Roman Civ Review by Christopher Erlinger

A pretty good article, but some lines, suchs as "The art found in the home of Julia Felix is also very interesting," seem to be filler and could probably be done away with. Also, your first section on names presents two interesting facts, but if there is some connection between the meanings in the two periods, it would be cool to touch on that. Your section entitled "Excavation" took me longer to read than most Wikipedia articles (and I get bored and just look at random articles sometimes) because it links to so many specific architectural terms. It makes the article even more informative than it already is, and shows you're well informed on the topic.

Thanks so much for the feedback everyone. It really helped. My biggest problem was with citations and you guys gave excellent tips. -Savena

Roman Civ Review by Anise K. Strong

Your citations are still a little off, but your research is very strong and you capture the essence of Julia Felix's importance very well.

Fair use rationale for Image:Julia Felix's Home.jpg

Image:Julia Felix's Home.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Victim of Vesuvius?

She died in the disaster? Was still alive? Her remains have been found?Revery (talk) 15:07, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Paquius Proculo

The portrait of Paquius Proculo is not associated with the House of Julia Felix, and was not found there. It was found and belongs to the house which bares the portrait's name, Paquius Proculo. This misidentification should be corrected, and the image should be removed from this page. 2602:30A:C070:6FF0:19E4:4547:272C:27A1 (talk) 07:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]