Jump to content

Talk:Hugh Catchpole

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Incorrect terminology - "Royal Army"

[edit]

There was never a Royal Army in British parlance - it has already been known as the British Army (if the corps/regiments were of the UK) or, if they were corps/regiments of undivided India during the time he served in WWII, the British Indian Army. This may be how the citations, published by Indian/Pakistani sources may suggest, but they are incorrect. It would be better if the corps/regiments he served in could be identified by anyone who can look up published details of his service.16:33, 29 December 2024 (UTC) Cloptonson (talk) 16:33, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]