Talk:Human rights reports on the 2011 Bahraini uprising

On 15 September 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Human rights reports on the Bahraini uprising of 2011 to Human rights reports on the 2011 Bahraini uprising. The result of the discussion was moved.

Separating/Merging reports

At least 6 of the reports included in this topic had their own article. Currently only 3 do. Wikipedians are invited to help decide which individual articles about reports might be able to be considered notable enough as encyclopedia topics to remain separate.

User:Boud and me agreed on keeping the individual articles about reports (as in currently). All other ideas/opinions are welcome. Bahraini Activist (talk) 22:58, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work :). IMHO it should now be easier to focus discussion on individual human rights missions/delegations/reports - are some notable enough to WP:SPLIT off? - should some be further compressed since they're not notable enough and don't contain enough notable information to remain as subpages?

The article itself is IMHO clearly too long to compress and put in the main article. IMHO it's now in a format where it should not be too difficult for motivated editors to work on general improvements. Boud (talk) 19:28, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Two more reports by Human Rights first

Can be found here: [1] and [2]. Will add them later when I get time. Bahraini Activist (talk) 17:11, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New report by Human Rights First

[3]. Bahraini Activist ^{Talk to me} 06:53, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New report by Human Rights Watch

[4]. Bahraini Activist ^{Talk to me} 12:06, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Protesters fests toward Pearl roundabout.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Protesters fests toward Pearl roundabout.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Protesters fests toward Pearl roundabout.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:17, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New report by BCHR

[5]. Mohamed CJ (talk) 19:34, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And another new report by Amnesty [6]. Mohamed CJ (talk) 14:03, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

copyright violations

I've just gotten done removing large chunks of the article that were copied directly from websites. I may have missed some, if I have please remove it or put it in your own words. Anything I have removed can be reworded to avoid the copyright violation and replaced in the article. I was not able to see the Irish Times article, and I'm concerned that parts of the Irish Fact Finding Delegation section may be copyright violations; every other section had them. Can someone with access to the article please check? Thanks! delldot ∇. 06:56, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No CV found (report). Did you check all other sections..? You've done a great job! Mohamed CJ (talk) 08:51, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, great, thanks for checking. Yes, I checked every section but the lead I think. I'm glad you're not mad that I stripped it down so much. delldot ∇. 22:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Of course I'm not mad; no one should be mad for removing CVs. Actually, I'm glad you're not mad that I left it unchecked for such a long time despite knowing it could have contained CVs. Mohamed CJ (talk) 12:20, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cool cool. I hate to ask, but are there other articles that may need this same treatment? delldot ∇. 03:17, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is only one article that I highly suspect in, but the aforementioned list include these as well, but I suspect they may only contain close paraphrasing if any at all (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8). Mohamed CJ (talk) 05:44, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh, sounds like a lot of work to check all those, can you look over the close paraphrasing ones (since it will be harder for me to find those) and I will start on the international rankings? delldot ∇. 21:55, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know that "ugh" feeling lol. Looks like you're already done. Leave the rest on me and maybe continue the review? Mohamed CJ (talk) 14:00, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. delldot ∇. 01:11, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Human rights reports on the Bahraini uprising of 2011. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6AArwb9tn to http://files.bici.org.bh/BICIreportEN.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:06, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Human rights reports on the Bahraini uprising of 2011. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:59, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Bahraini uprising of 2011 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:19, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]