Talk:Humboldt, Nebraska

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Humboldt, Nebraska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:37, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of images[edit]

An editor has repeatedly removed recently-added photos from this article, as well as from Rulo, Nebraska. The reason given was MOS:IMAGELOCATION which states that editors should "[A]void sandwiching text between two images that face each other, or between an image and infobox".

To appease this edit, the images were added back as a gallery, but the editor removed those too.

Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images states that "images must be significant and relevant in the topic's context". At both of these three articles, these were the only historical photos.

I'd appreciate the input of other editors about whether the layout of this article outweights the importance of its content.

Images removed[edit]

Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 03:45, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Magnolia677: You might try using the "image stack template" as shown here: [1]. Woodlot (talk) 20:40, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]