Talk:Hurricane Beatriz (2011)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Hurricane Beatriz (2011) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
October 16, 2011 Good article nominee Listed
WikiProject Tropical cyclones / Storms / Eastern Pacific  (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tropical cyclones, which collaborates on tropical cyclones and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the storm articles task force (marked as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Pacific hurricane articles task force (marked as Low-importance).


Why is a separate article created for Beatriz? Why didn't Adrian get one then? 89119 (talk) 02:47, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Adrian had little/no impact on land while Beatriz has prompted hurricane warnings. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 02:50, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Beatriz got an article because it is threatening land as we speak. Adrian should i have gotten one, and I myself /might write Adrian in a day or two. YE Tropical Cyclone
Adrian can still get one, based on its high intensity. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 02:56, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Not to mention Adrian did prompt tropical storm watches. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:03, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Adrian doesn't need an article. As per Cyclonebiskit, "Adrian had little/no impact on land". Adrian only prompted a tropical storm watch for western Mexico. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 09:12, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Assuming non-NHC sources can be found, it should get one to due its high intensity. YE Tropical Cyclone 13:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Beatriz (2011)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Yellow Evan (talk · contribs) 15:11, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Here are my comments

  • "Originating from an area of disturbed weather on June 19, 2011, several hundred miles south-southeast of Mexico, Beatriz gradually intensified." no need for 2011 IMO.
  • Wikilink Mexico in lead.
  • Lead should be one paragraph due to lack of impact.
  • "However, the overall effects of Beatriz were limited and the rains were largely beneficial in mitigating a severe drought." I'd changed that to "Overall, effects of Beatriz were minor and the rains were largely beneficial in mitigating a severe drought."
  • "Three hours after classification, the depression strengthened Tropical Storm Beatriz, the named storm of the 2011 Pacific hurricane season." Is it more or is a word missing?
  • Why isn't the recon flight mention in the MH?
  • Wikilink Mexico in MH if you wikilink Guatemala/
  • Any damage totals?
  • Why ins't the SNM report used in the article?
  • I think you got the ref and work fields mixed up. Isn't NHC the publisher and NOAA the work?

Otherwise, it's good. I am leaving this nomination on hold. YE Pacific Hurricane 15:11, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Passing. YE Pacific Hurricane 15:53, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Hurricane Beatriz (2011). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:50, 4 July 2016 (UTC)