Talk:Hurricane Dolly (1996)

Hurricane Dolly (1996) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 6, 2016. (Reviewed version).

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Merge

Not notable enough, and too little info. I vote for a merger. Hurricanehink 19:47, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This one is slightly more than a stub I think...if the impact section could be tripled with interesting information, it could live. Otherwise, no. Jdorje 20:07, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I vote merge. No impact information exists beyond the basics. All the new information here could easily fit into the main article. -- §Hurricane ERIC § archive -- my dropsonde 03:28, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article already says what is in the Tropical Cyclone report, and I doubt there is much more. The storm just didn't do that much. Hurricanehink 14:21, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Added more information Storm05 18:19, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All you did was add a death table, write the uncertainty of the death toll, and explained indirect/direct deaths. Still vote merge. Hurricanehink 22:09, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. -- §Hurricane ERIC § archive -- my dropsonde 14:26, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Todo 2

It's pretty good so far. A copyedit is needed all around. Some sections could be elaborated further. For example, the Texas section. Was the rainfall directly from Dolly's outer bands, or was it from Dolly's moisture? Also, could you get some damage info? Hurricanehink (talk) 16:21, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Dolly (1996)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Will211 (talk · contribs) 00:44, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, will review. Will211 |Chatter 00:44, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Review

In the first caption you may want to clarify whether this is the first or second time Dolly is making landfall, since it made landfall twice.

Added the date--12george1 (talk) 03:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Throughout the Yucatán Peninsula, airports and port were closed"-I assume you meant airports and ports?

Fixed--12george1 (talk) 03:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Under the Texas section, United States should be linked and Texas should probably be linked again.

Done--12george1 (talk) 03:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't Belize and the United States be added under the areas affected column in the infobox, since they had also been affected from the storm?

Done--12george1 (talk) 03:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And just as a note, the first link in the external links section is dead.

Replaced--12george1 (talk) 03:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty well written, with only the minor points above needing fixing. Will place on hold for seven days. Will211 |Chatter 03:14, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Will211: I'm finished with fixing these issues. Thanks for the review.--12george1 (talk) 03:27, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Very well, will pass article. Will211 |Chatter 18:52, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]