Talk:Hwabyeong

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Psychiatry Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Psychiatry portal This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hwabyeong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:19, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely needs more references

I put the references tag in (in my edit summary I was inaccurate: the technical portion of the article contains "few," not "no" references), but as I thought about it I realized how easily the lack of references could be misconstrued in an article about a culturally-linked psychosomatic of psychiatric condition, so I figured the POV tag would get the article some more attention. I am not accusing anyone of intentionally neglecting NPOV when writing/editing this article, but I also believe that if editors do not wish to be accused of that they will then give this article the right kind of attention and provide more and better references (by "better" I not only mean "from peer-reviewed scientific literature and manuals," but also "in English" as this is the English-language wiki; most scientific research is published or at least duplicated in English today so if this condition is well-documented as suggested by some of the notably non-scientific "surveys" referenced in the article's opening, then there should be references that fulfill both meanings of "better references").Ecthelion83 (talk) 19:52, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Malicious modification made by Netto-uyoku

Netto-uyoku believe that "Hwabyeong (ja:火病, ko:화병) is Korean Culture-bound syndrome, and a lot of Korean people have a disease of Hwabyeong, so Korean people instantly go crazy by mental stress" .

But this claim is fake news, and Netto-uyoku libel Korean-Japanese (Korean residents in Japan) using the term of 火病 (en:Hwabyeong), based on their belief that mentioned above, so it must be stopped.

I have deleted the following 3 items, because I think those are malicious modification made by Netto-uyoko.

"Amuk" in "Causes"

Hwabyeong was Culture-bound syndrome of South Korea, which is belong to East Asia, not South Asia. Amuk is Culture-bound syndrome of South Asia, and is not related to Hwabyeong. Amuk is exactly a disease, not Cause.

"Reference 5" of "中央日報の記事"

The article of "Reference 5" ^[1] mentioned that ""35.2% of Korean people has Hwabyeong" , is not consistent with the "4.1% of the general population in a rural area in Korea" mentioned in the article.

"See also" and "Ataque de nervios"

The DSM-IV-TR list of Culture-bound syndrome include both Ataque de nervios and Hwabyeong (see. DSM-IV-TR list). But the DSM-5 list of Culture-bound syndrome include Ataque de nervios, but dose not include Hwabyeong (see. DSM-5 list). So Hwabyeong has no relationship to Ataque de nervios.

I apologize to Wikipedia users all over the world, especially Korean people, as one of Japanese. --NoNetouyo (talk) 03:17, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ (in Japanese) 韓国の会社員が最もむかつく瞬間は？中央日報日本語版 2013年4月2日

[1] (in Japanese) 韓国の会社員が最もむかつく瞬間は？中央日報日本語版 2013年4月2日

[1]